Steveill the Weevill (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} synabetic) wrote,@ 2009-01-06 19:03:00 |
|
TWITTER laughs at your bacon!
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter
- 20:23 @marcmason Wow! That's almost like me saying X-Men 3 is my fave in that trilogy... almost. and yes, I'm prepared to go into hiding. #
- 20:24 @Jollybgood Yeah, totally. Him and/or Ricky Gervais. #
- 20:36 @marcmason ha! And wait until I tell you about how I liked Ang Lee's Hulk over the new one... more hiding? #
- 20:38 @marcmason Honestly, I liked each X film for different reasons. All of them have their individual merits. To me, anyway. #
- 20:52 @marcmason See, I disagree. Then again, I haven't liked the X-comics in 15 years, so that might have something to do with it. #
- 20:52 @marcmason Also, AL's Hulk is a full movie with a story. The new Hulk, though it looks great (yay Roth!) it's lacking a... story. #
- 20:53 @marcmason I still can't figure out why so many people hate X3. It wasn't awesome, but I didn't think it was that bad... and theyre a team. #
- 20:55 @marcmason But can we agree that SM3 was a terrible, terrible film? :) #
- 20:57 I should state for the record that I did indeed enjoy Ultimate X-Men for 40 or so issues. #
- 12:37 @dennisculver Very nice! I love the cube. #
- 12:54 @missnulling Have a good flight and a good time, yo! #
- 12:55 @ryanspeck You know what to do. Set them on fire. #
- 12:58 Vox seems to be benefiting from that news about LJ. heh #
- 16:04 @declanshalvey Nice. Thank ye, sir! #
- 16:05 @FFTimberwolf I backed it up about a month back.. I guess I should do it again. I seriously doubt LJ will suffer a sudden demise. #
- 16:07 @marcmason SM3 had great parts to it... but it was horribly paced, badly written in parts and just plain bad. Sad, really. #
- 18:28 @marcmason Totally. Are they going to reboot the franchise, you think? #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter
